5 comments

  • utopiah 6 minutes ago
  • Meneth 48 minutes ago
    "low-latency links", says the article. I wonder if they consider 500 ms ping to be low, or if they want to replace Geostationary with Low Earth Orbit.
    • fidotron 7 minutes ago
      Getting it to work with one end stationary first sounds like a reasonable development plan. LEO adds a lot of complexity, but with huge benefits.

      OTOH the number of engineers that focus on throughput over latency is quite staggering.

      • IrishTechie 2 minutes ago
        I guess if your goal is just to stream aircraft telemetry and black box like recordings then latency may not be high on the agenda.
  • myrmidon 1 hour ago
    I'm really curious how the tracking works in such a system, and how "bad" the beam spread is (my impression is that from the diffraction limit alone the beam has to be spread over at least a ~10m radius after travelling 36000km).

    Some info on the laser itself would also be very interesting (power? wavelength?).

    Really cool project though!

    • amelius 51 minutes ago
      > and how "bad" the beam spread is

      The spread makes the tracking easier, I suppose.

  • cm2187 57 minutes ago
    But that means you need to have a different laser pointed at every single individual aircraft right? Doesn’t really scale.
    • amelius 48 minutes ago
      I suppose you can do time-sharing. And use mems-mirrors to quickly move the beam between different targets.
  • xnx 2 hours ago
    Impressive! I believe round trip latency would be 0.5 seconds.