The 1944 Warsaw Uprising, in Color

(barwypowstania.pl)

84 points | by keiferski 2 hours ago

7 comments

  • Keyframe 1 hour ago
    These two in particular:

    https://www.barwypowstania.pl/photos/22

    https://www.barwypowstania.pl/photos/51

    and the world is stupid enough to repeat the endless cycle of violence.

  • sdoering 1 hour ago
    Great work. My SO is doing family research on the part of her family that came from Warsaw (and a few other parts of Poland). I know she will love to see those.
  • TheOtherHobbes 1 hour ago
    Harrowing.

    For those who don't know, the Uprising was a planned resistance action to expel the Nazis from Warsaw.

    Supposedly it was planned in collaboration with the Russians. But the Russian army stood down while the resistance fought alone for two months.

    This allowed the Germans to regroup, fight back, and eventually to destroy the city, and most of the resistance itself.

    • shakow 35 minutes ago
      It was definitely not planned with the Soviets, for multiple reasons:

        - the Poles of the AK (London government loyal) were not the communist faction (Lublin government loyal), and saw the insurrection as the last chance to get a Poland out of the Soviet sphere of influence post WWII – especially after the publicization of Katyn;
      
        - even if they had wanted, Stalin had zero interest in giving a hand to London-loyal Poles that were in frontal opposition to “his” Lublin-loyal Poles;
      
        - the Germans were not caught flat-footed, they already knew of the insurrection preparations and therefore not only was the city well garrisoned, it would have been in any case, as it was the strategic lock of the area to hold the RKKA on the Vistula;
      
        - and all the above is moot in any case, because the RKKA units that reached the neighborhood of Warsaw in '44 had as many chance of taking the city as the German units that reached Moscow in '41 – they were just spent and at the end of their logistic tail after months of fighting during the Bagration operation, and had no chance of successfully developing an opposed crossing of the Vistula against two Panzerkorps.
      
      
      So the London-loyal Poles were in a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation, and at least they were able to go with a glorious bang. Like a Marshal said, “c'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la guerre”.
      • pzo 24 minutes ago
        > So the London-loyal Poles were in a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation, and at least they were able to go with a glorious bang.

        Many argue this uprising is nothing to be proud of and the crime of the leadership with devastating results: ~200k civilians went with this bang, and city completely wiped out.

        • shakow 17 minutes ago
          This is a question I don't feel qualified enough to lean one way or the other.
    • consumer451 34 minutes ago
      For more context, WWII was started as a partnership between Hitler and Stalin to partition Poland. [0]

      Spreading this knowledge is now illegal in Putin's Russia. [1]

      [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pac...

      [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_Against_Rehabilitation_of_... (that name, lol)

    • spwa4 1 hour ago
      It was an attempt of the Polish resistance to avoid being "liberated" by the Soviets to just immediately become occupied by the communist red army. The idea being to liberate Warsaw and get US/UK assistance through the Polish government-in-exile in London to establish Polish military control before the Soviet army arrived. Getting US/UK support could have meant that Poland remained an independent state. Instead, Stalin not only betrayed them, but later actually convicted the surviving leaders of the uprising. "Crimes against communism".

      This is now politely referred to as a Soviet betrayal in service of "Stalin's post-war political goals for Poland".

    • pstuart 1 hour ago
      Did Russia back out to intentionally let it happen or did they chicken out to avoid fighting the nazis?
      • Robotbeat 1 hour ago
        Intentionally. Allowed the Soviets to administer the place when the Nazis finally left, as the Polish resistance had been crushed. Unforgiveable.
  • Robotbeat 1 hour ago
    Incredible to see just so many smiling, cheerful faces surrounded by utter destruction and death. The power of comradery, I suppose.
    • pzo 43 minutes ago
      It shows only the better part but doesn't show the bad part. Poles are divided about usefulness of this uprising, how it was (badly) executed and many believe it was deemed to fail.

      The aftermath [1] was that ~220k Poles died and out of that 150-200k civilians, often with mass execution - later on a lot of warsaw population was sometimes bitter toward the uprising’s leadership.

      To put it in context: within 2 months 200k people died, similar number like in Hiroshima but almost nobody wordwide know about warsaw uprising.

      [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_Uprising#Aftermath

  • maradon 1 hour ago
    [dead]
  • siltcakes 30 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • cramsession 1 hour ago
    [flagged]
    • ngruhn 47 minutes ago
      They were fighting the German army. Hamas mostly and intentionally gunned down civilizations and then took some hostages for good measure.
      • cramsession 45 minutes ago
        [flagged]
        • ngruhn 34 minutes ago
          Wow, Hamas is _more_ justified? The Nazi's invaded Poland. Doesn't get more stolen than that. Also again: one is slaughtering civilians, the other is fighting the army. This is not even comparable.
          • cramsession 32 minutes ago
            Yes Hamas is more justified. Zionists had already been 75 years into the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
        • yakshaving_jgt 24 minutes ago
          Lots of Polish people on this website, including me.

          What makes you think you're in a position to qualify the morality of the deaths of my not-so-distant relatives at the hands of Nazi invaders?

          • cramsession 20 minutes ago
            I think you should take a step back and listen to what I'm saying. Are you able to reflect on how the Warsaw Uprising is treated different than the Oct 7th Uprising? Why do you think that is? Are you helping to perpetuate that moral discrepancy?
            • yakshaving_jgt 17 minutes ago
              I think you should watch your words, because if you weren't flapping your gums from behind the safety of a keyboard someone might watch them for you.
              • cramsession 16 minutes ago
                I'm 100% sure threatening other Hacker News users with violence is against site regulations.
        • sdoering 41 minutes ago
          [dead]
    • sdoering 51 minutes ago
      What is slaughtering babies, raping innocent women and girls and any festival partygoer, if not just despicable terrorism?

      Anyone (yes, every single one in my book) who is defending Oct 7th is nothing but fueling antisemitism.

      • cramsession 50 minutes ago
        Did the Nazis also make up atrocity propaganda related to the Warsaw Uprising? I'm genuinely curious if this is a Zionist "innovation" or if they really are exactly like the Nazis.
        • sdoering 44 minutes ago
          Calling documented Hamas atrocities “Zionist atrocity propaganda” while comparing Jews/Zionists to Nazis is not “genuine curiosity”. It is denial and Nazi inversion.

          The Warsaw Uprising was an armed revolt against Nazi occupation forces. Oct 7 involved the deliberate killing and abduction of civilians, including people at a music festival and families in their homes. That distinction is not subtle.

          You can oppose Israeli policy without denying or laundering Hamas terrorism. If your argument requires doing that, the problem is the argument.

    • breppp 53 minutes ago
      I am only guessing but maybe the mass slaughter, rape, burning, dismemberment, kidnapping of civilians is more like the behavior of the Nazis than the Poles in this case
      • cramsession 51 minutes ago
        All of those things are Zionist staples since initial contact of Ashkenazis with Palestine.
        • sdoering 50 minutes ago
          q.e.d.

          As expected from the original comment: Nothing but antisemitic rhetoric.

          • cramsession 49 minutes ago
            What did I say that's antisemitic? Ashkenazis aren't even Semitic and their factual history is just that.
    • sdoering 35 minutes ago
      [dead]