London to Calcutta by Bus (2022)

(amusingplanet.com)

39 points | by CGMthrowaway 1 day ago

6 comments

  • lmm 2 hours ago
    Needs (2022), in particular for this part:

    > Now more than forty years later, an India-based travel operator Adventures Overland announced a bus service from New Delhi to London and back, covering 20,000 km and travelling through 18 countries in 70 days. The service was supposed to start in 2021, but got delayed, probably due to the Covid pandemic. The first bus is expected to leave in April next year.

    I wondered what route they were planning, because Iran is still pretty unwelcoming to Brits (funny how overthrowing their government will do that to you), and turns out the plan was to head East through Burma and then Northwest through China and eventually Russia. Obviously there are a couple of problems with that now.

  • merelysounds 39 minutes ago
    This bus route has its own Wikipedia page, well deserved too:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London%E2%80%93Calcutta_bus_se...

  • 6Az4Mj4D 2 hours ago
    Thank you for sharing. It seems bus is enjoying fully.

    Really good tires, battery and passenger butts to endure such a long journey in the bus :)

  • voidUpdate 36 minutes ago
    How did the bus drive from England to mainland Europe? I'm not sure I'd class the journey as "by bus" if it also includes ferries
    • modo_mario 19 minutes ago
      I'm sure I'd class the journey by bus because the reference to the necessary and proportionally tiny boat or eurotunnel crossing would be seen as obvious, unnecessary and annoying.
    • argsnd 33 minutes ago
      The ferries would be brief enough though. Probably less than 100 out of the total 10,000 miles.
    • lostlogin 28 minutes ago
      Can you stay in the bus when it’s on the ferry?
      • martheen 6 minutes ago
        For crossing the Channel, definitely not. A very special exception can be made with prior arrangement for those with disabilities that made entering & leaving their vehicle too cumbersome, but they aren't going to ride this kind of bus.
  • kleiba2 1 hour ago
    Pure adventure!

    > The journey took fifty days...

    ...so not for the working folks.

  • tobi_bsf 2 hours ago
    Back then, people taking those buses enjoyed life more than most do today.
    • alephnerd 2 hours ago
      > people taking those buses enjoyed life more than most do today

      Benefits of being rich.

      A £150 round trip ticket in 1957 is the equivalent of £4,600 today, and in an era when average wages were around £400 per year [0].

      Taking months off to bum around the hippy trail in the 1960s spending almost half of the average person's salary would have put you in the upper middle class to say the least. Alternatively, imagine spending £15,000 on a multi-month trip in 2026 like going to Antarctica, ascending an ultra, participating in the Dakar Rally, or racing the Iditarod.

      Plenty of Brits in the era (especially the lower middle class and upwardly mobile) would have decided to spend that money on a ticket to move to Australia, Canada, New Zealand, or America instead.

      [0] - https://fred.stlouisfed.org/data/AWEPPUKQ

      • physicsguy 24 minutes ago
        Especially when it was £20 to move the whole family (kids were free) to Australia. My great uncle and aunt did just that, after national service he was in business working for Walls ice cream. Took himself and two kids off in early 60s, were in a a Nissen hut for a few weeks til he found a job over there.
    • altmanaltman 1 hour ago
      Why do you think so?
    • lmm 2 hours ago
      Citation needed. Perhaps they took the buses because everyday life was so much more boring then.