Update on "Co-authored-by: Copilot" in commit messages

(github.com)

37 points | by extesy 1 hour ago

9 comments

  • jwilliams 2 minutes ago
    Are they apologizing? Was it a bug? Why did they make this decision and what's the end goal? It's so unclear from the message - as evidenced by a lot of the responses.
  • Waterluvian 31 minutes ago
    All the people there asking the simple question of why it got changed and getting ignored.
    • xigoi 15 minutes ago
      We all know the answer anyway.
  • est 40 minutes ago
    I am using a different approach.

    `user.email` is always my email.

    `user.name` is either my account name, or model name like `gpt-5.5-high`.

    I can easily filter & blame which line was written by me or some specific AI

  • m3kw9 11 minutes ago
    Default to ON is a complete dik move
  • peyton 39 minutes ago
    Inserting authorship claims is incredibly tacky. It’s today’s “Intel Inside” sticker. I don’t want your stickers on the computer I bought.

    “Sent from my iPhone” isn’t an authorship claim.

    • AuthAuth 12 minutes ago
      Sent from my iPhone is worse than intel inside or claude in the commits in my opinion.

      There is something so gross about injecting an advertising message into every single communication a user has on their device.

    • kelseydh 35 minutes ago
      On the flip side there are people who believe that LLM-assisted coding changes require attribution in git history.
      • silverwind 5 minutes ago
        It's definitely helpful to know whether a PR was AI-assisted or not and the git attribution line is a simple and effective way of communicating that.

        I also recommend specifying model name and version so the maintainer knows upfront the level of slop they are dealing with.

    • dyauspitr 32 minutes ago
      What’s the problem with intel inside? That’s perfectly normal.
      • reaperducer 24 minutes ago
        What’s the problem with intel inside? That’s perfectly normal.

        I don't want my computer to look like it's racing in NASCAR.

  • shimman 38 minutes ago
    Honestly extremely pathetic by a trillion dollar corporation that has a massive, undemocratic, say in how technology is developed in this country.

    Microsoft should be broken up into a dozen different companies and it's quite clear they violated their consent decree from the US DOJ a few decades later, so they should get punished extra hard. Maybe nationalize Excel putting it in the public domain for starters.

    • dyauspitr 31 minutes ago
      Yeah break up all the big companies so Chinese state sponsored behemoths can take over everything. This isn’t the 90s where Americans only competed with other Americans.
      • alehlopeh 28 minutes ago
        GP didn’t say all the big tech companies. Just Microslop.
      • Waterluvian 24 minutes ago
        Honestly not sure I find that prospect worse than the American status quo. At least the Chinese regime is a rational actor.
      • starfallg 27 minutes ago
        Nope, just break up the one that has been consistently found to be abusing their market position. Microsoft has been embroiled in this since the 90s.
  • jdw64 41 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • gowld 12 minutes ago
    [flagged]