I may be silly but why would you ever want to validate the structure of an opaque authentication key?
Couldn't you just hit an harmless endpoint (e.g. /rate_limit) to see if it returns 401 or not?
GHA have always been a PITA for any serious DevOps; it's quite clear they were designed to integrate in 7 lines of code and then tell everyone who complains that they're doing it wrong.
It is a PITA, but that can be significantly improved IMHO if you just write shell script wrappers for your tasks. Not only does it make it easier to run CI locally, but it also makes it so much easier to move platforms in the future.
When the GH action YAML is just invoking shell scripts, I find it quite pleasant to use
I was the reporter on this one. If you have Github Actions in your organization, disable them immediately if you're unsure which version of composer your Github Actions run.
Could you elaborate on this bit on why Github's secret masking doesn't work here:
> GitHub Actions' built-in secret masker matches registered values as exact substrings. When the exception message is rendered by Symfony Console it may wrap, embed in In BaseIO.php line N: framing, or interleave with ANSI control sequences. So the masker does not redact, and the plaintext token reaches the log.
What does this log rendering look like such that the token from that code snippet becomes interleaved enough to not be a substring match?
I'm not familiar with composer/Symfony but I would expect something like:
From what I can tell Symfony wraps these errors in a styled error block so it messes with GitHub's masking. For example, newlines breaking up the token are apparently enough to trick the masker since it's not a substring anymore.
For your example:
Line 34: <red>ghs_fdsafdsarewqfdsa...</red>
Is probably long enough in most cases to break to a new line.
Also, those blocks get "interleaved" like this:
<red>ghs_fdsafdsarewqfdsafdsa</red>
<red>fdsardsardsafdsafs......</red>
So there are now </red>'s within the token, also breaking the substring matching.
This is kind of eye-opening for me -- I have never thought about how styled output like this could cause logging leakages.
That's my understanding. This seems to only effect PHP projects that use Composer in GitHub actions. Examples being usage of shivammathur/setup-php and or php-actions/composer.
If everyone that can read the logs are people who can read the secrets, then nothing. If there are any log readers who should be be secret readers, its a potentially exposed secret.
This does not surprise me.
When the GH action YAML is just invoking shell scripts, I find it quite pleasant to use
How many other actions/libraries do you think are vulnerable?
> GitHub Actions' built-in secret masker matches registered values as exact substrings. When the exception message is rendered by Symfony Console it may wrap, embed in In BaseIO.php line N: framing, or interleave with ANSI control sequences. So the masker does not redact, and the plaintext token reaches the log.
What does this log rendering look like such that the token from that code snippet becomes interleaved enough to not be a substring match?
I'm not familiar with composer/Symfony but I would expect something like:
For your example:
Line 34: <red>ghs_fdsafdsarewqfdsa...</red>
Is probably long enough in most cases to break to a new line.
Also, those blocks get "interleaved" like this:
<red>ghs_fdsafdsarewqfdsafdsa</red>
<red>fdsardsardsafdsafs......</red>
So there are now </red>'s within the token, also breaking the substring matching.
This is kind of eye-opening for me -- I have never thought about how styled output like this could cause logging leakages.
This include's the GITHUB_TOKEN that is builtin within a actions jobs.
It's not an issue in GHA itself, this time. But if you are a composer user in GH, you should definitely be warned (and worried).