My Homelab AI Dev Platform

(rsgm.dev)

63 points | by rsgm 2 hours ago

9 comments

  • MisterPea 2 minutes ago
    Some times I feel like a lot of people in tech independently go through the same things right around the same time with few people writing/sharing about it.

    I am also creating this and enjoyed the post and comments all going through the same thing :)

  • david-giesberg 30 minutes ago
    I've been doing something pretty similar, except instead of having a persistent opencode server, I've been using this workflow that runs opencode inside of the Forgejo action runners:

    https://codeberg.org/dragonfyre13/forgejo-opencode

    Still tinkering with it, but the gist is that I can invoke Opencode with /oc inside of an Forgejo issue, then it will come back with a PR for me to review.

  • doctorspazz 48 minutes ago
    I've been trying to find the motivation to do a write up on my AI lab, and this is just what I needed. Thanks for sharing. My setup is a similar idea, just with n8n/git/argo/k3s. It's mainly for automated workflows that Qwen or Gemma4 can handle.
  • dlxfoo 58 minutes ago
    Im doing something very similar. Running my OpenCode on a proxmox lxc. I have an additional layer of Kimaki, which gives you Discord integration (hate it or love it). Chatting with your codebase (voice messages, too, if that’s your jam), is very very cool.
    • rsgm 46 minutes ago
      That's very cool. Thanks, I'll have to check that out.
  • taleodor 51 minutes ago
    Very cool, we're doing similar except we let agents open PRs as well + we track release metadata and agentic sessions via our ReARM system + we've recently launched an option for agents to track helm-based deployments via ReARM - https://docs.rearmhq.com/workflows/devops.html
  • variety8675 1 hour ago
    How do you run inference for Open Code? What models are you running
  • _def 1 hour ago
    I wonder how gitops is done with docker compose
    • stryan 44 minutes ago
      I see a lot of people using Komodo for it, though if I had to pick I'd go with Doco CD[0]. You can also use standard Ansible for just cron+bash script to git pull.

      On the Podman side, I wrote a tool named Materia[1] for it, but there's also the wonderful Ansible quadlet role as well as Quadit and Orchess.

      [0] https://github.com/kimdre/doco-cd

      [1] https://primamateria.systems or https://github.com/stryan/materia

    • rsgm 52 minutes ago
      I recently setup Arcane and started migrating stuff from Truenas apps, they were all deployed as custom docker compose services so it worked out. Arcane supports Git syncs to auto deploy compose stacks, https://getarcane.app/docs/features/projects#sync-from-git I'll write up some posts on my full setup soon.
      • blumomo 34 minutes ago
        What _IS_ Arcane? I fail to understand from their website https://getarcane.app/

        Is it a deployment automation platform where it can run a project’s docker services, with rollback and all?

        • rsgm 19 minutes ago
          so, the project is pretty much vibe coded, including the docs. It makes a lot more sense if you play around with it. It's just a docker host management UI, I like using it. It has gitops built in and a nice container log view. It doesn't do rollbacks, it only seems to sync from git and run compose up.
  • fazgha 1 hour ago
    So first post in the blog, and it went directly HN frontpage.

    Then, I said homelab AI, I thought it's an interesting post about local GPU setup (and I am really interested in this topic).. but no, just another hype post about how to use whatever-code...

    • rsgm 1 hour ago
      I looked into running local models last month. They just aren't quite there for agentic tool use workflows without spending a small fortune. I'm hopeful smaller local models get much better soon.

      I was also hoping to put out another post on my homelab setup, it has some neat stuff, but I haven't had a chance to finish it.

      • sosodev 57 minutes ago
        I think it heavily depends on what you're asking the model to do. Qwen3.6, both 27B and 35B-A3B, do agentic tool use very well. Their decision making is sus, but the dense model is decent in that way. A 4-bit quant for either of those can run on many home systems with a bit of configuration.

        The biggest issue I've noticed is that the chat templates for open models are really hit or miss. The default Qwen3.6 chat template mostly works these days, but depending on your workload it may cause major issues. There are plenty of "fixed" chat templates on hugging face, but people report mixed success. It really seems to depend a lot on what the tool you're using expects.

    • reactordev 1 hour ago
      you can't explain the HN hug. You feel it, or your servers do.
  • johnnytech 1 hour ago
    Really cool! Do you autoapprove edits or do you approve manually?
    • rsgm 1 hour ago
      I'll verify the PR code myself before merging, but that's usually a quick skim.