Worth noting this is pretty standard university PR. It is written with author involvement so it’s likely technically correct but it is aimed at getting it picked up so it often makes it sound flowery and contains multiple descriptions of generally the same thing with different analogies or simplifications that anyone writing an article from this can parrot easily.
https://people.csail.mit.edu/mengjia/data/2026.SP.fractal.pd...
I found the paper a little thin. What is anybody getting out of this work?