EF Core 11 makes your split queries faster

(steven-giesel.com)

36 points | by rellem 7 days ago

2 comments

  • exceptione 58 minutes ago
    I don't understand the argument why `AsSplitQuery` could be more performant than a single round trip involving a multi join query. People mention data duplication and increased memory usage, but I would assume that `duplication` is just a matter of an extra pointer, not a bit-for-bit duplication of every reference to a single row.

    Please enlighten me.

    • azibi 0 minutes ago
      There is a name for this problem, Cartesian explosion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_explosion
    • fabian2k 23 minutes ago
      Assume you fetch a single customer entity with their 100 order entities as includes. With single query this will join both tables and produce 100 rows that contain the order data but also each one contains the customer data redundantly. Now Imagine you had two includes there, that will multiply the number of rows again.

      AsSingleQuery is as dangerous as this makes it sound. This works surprisingly well if you know that the number of included entities is low, but only then.

      You can get much better queries here if you write a Select() and let EF Core translate that into SQL. That will probably do roughly want you are imagining here, usually with subqueries fetching the data from related entities.

    • fuzzy2 41 minutes ago
      If you join multiple/many tables, you could end up with a large volume of data. And yes, this is bit-for-bit duplication—on the network. The query result is (typically) a single table. This table will get serialized as-is, with all duplicate data.
      • exceptione 30 minutes ago
        Couldn't we make references as `byte offsets in the result set` work to handle duplication? Real memory pointers wouldn't work over the network of course, but if the database driver would return results like this, the client could easily stitch these together. My hunch is that even if we implement references on a higher level than raw byte offsets it would still be more performant than just returning R1*R2 bytes for any R1<1:N>R2.

        ---

        EDIT: According to LLM friends you could achieve before wire de-duplication by using FOR JSON AUTO in SQL Server or jsonb_agg in PostgreSQL. Not sure how much overhead that incurs though.

  • preetham_rangu 3 hours ago
    The real win in EF Core 11 is pruning the reference-nav joins out of split child queries, that's been dead weight since AsSplitQuery existed.