As an old guy reading this I had a lot of wtf moments during the setup. Then I laughed pretty hard when we eventually got to this line. Like there's a reason we invented cookies and all mature web frameworks use them for auth.
> Like there's a reason we invented cookies and all mature web frameworks use them for auth.
Cookie stealers, issues with third-party cookies and tracking... it's not like the past was a paradise, in fact, quite the opposite. Hell I 'member times when we had to append ?PHPSESSID=... to URLs. Cookies were a stopgap...
localStorage is very much fine and arguably superior to cookies for authentication tokens. First of all, once you have achieved JS execution on a target origin, you can send requests, open up malicious "login" prompts and generally control everything the user sees and does. The article mentions this, but plays it down with no good arguments.
Much more importantly however, is that the cookie standards are a mess! The complexity of cookie default behaviour, their flags, scopes, differences in their SOP (cookies ignore ports for example, so https://example.com:443 and https://example.com:8443 share their cookies) are huge. Research papers have been written in this. And don't even get started on differentials between browsing engines.
This huge complexity of cookies opens up a whole class of authentication attacks where bad (or just weirdly) configured cookies can be stolen cross origin.
localStorage on the other hand is practically impossible to get wrong.
Cookies can be encrypted and signed and contain whatever information you want, not just some random token that has to be looked up in the database to be actually useful.
This is what aspnet core does by default if you enable cookie-based authentication. Gives you the best of both worlds.
smells a bit like AI, or AI helped article. Still, some points are explained quite clearly. Knew most of it, but still, some parts where a good reminder. I would always try to use bullet prooven framworks and NOT reinvent the wheel. Best way to go in 2026. There is simply too much angles of attack and knowing myself I would miss something.
If I use short-lived JWTs and localstorage, am I such a bad person? Are you truly increasing the blast radius?
Is there someone in another part of the world that would like hacking you only if you’re not using httpOnly cookies, happy to know that you used localstorage?
They use bots to promote their content to the front page and downvote any comments criticizing them. I observe this pattern consistently on this website.
As an old guy reading this I had a lot of wtf moments during the setup. Then I laughed pretty hard when we eventually got to this line. Like there's a reason we invented cookies and all mature web frameworks use them for auth.
Cookie stealers, issues with third-party cookies and tracking... it's not like the past was a paradise, in fact, quite the opposite. Hell I 'member times when we had to append ?PHPSESSID=... to URLs. Cookies were a stopgap...
Much more importantly however, is that the cookie standards are a mess! The complexity of cookie default behaviour, their flags, scopes, differences in their SOP (cookies ignore ports for example, so https://example.com:443 and https://example.com:8443 share their cookies) are huge. Research papers have been written in this. And don't even get started on differentials between browsing engines.
This huge complexity of cookies opens up a whole class of authentication attacks where bad (or just weirdly) configured cookies can be stolen cross origin.
localStorage on the other hand is practically impossible to get wrong.
This is what aspnet core does by default if you enable cookie-based authentication. Gives you the best of both worlds.
Is there someone in another part of the world that would like hacking you only if you’re not using httpOnly cookies, happy to know that you used localstorage?
I really want this era of AI generated writing that reads so poorly to end. Or at least society should be ashamed of publishing this content.