5 comments

  • rramon 2 minutes ago
    Just wondering how a matching backend framework for correctness would look like. Ideally something that doesn't repeat the React mess with two routers but fits right in Inertia style.
  • Etheryte 12 minutes ago
    I don't know, as far as I can tell the demo on the homepage is bugged? Or maybe I misunderstand how it's supposed to work? If I click reset after 2 seconds and then click add 1 right after it, the reset never fires. What's up with that, that's not what I expected to happen?
    • danfritz 2 minutes ago
      Yep, it seems that if you hammer messages things get easily dropped or the async behavior is not executed.

      IMO the reset should fire regardless what happens after it.

  • danfritz 6 minutes ago
    This feels a lot like sagas and redux sagas. Anyone else got that vibe?
  • dflock 24 minutes ago
    This looks interesting, and I've been keeping an eye on this for a while - but does anyone have experience from actually using this for real?
  • oofbey 18 minutes ago
    As agentic coding matures, this kind of project is the right direction. The mechanics of writing the code become less important. But having a language framework that naturally resists mistakes will become increasingly useful and important.

    Similar to how Rust is obviously a better choice today than C++. Who cares if the language is “more difficult” to code in, if the agents are doing the coding. What we need is building blocks that make it harder to author bugs.

    • dflock 15 minutes ago
      That's an interesting - and maybe correct - point. Looking at the examples, it seems very long winded and not something I would want to write myself - but maybe I don't need to care about that anymore, as you say!
    • whattheheckheck 7 minutes ago
      And tla+ / sequence diagram / user flow diagrams / data models all in one "thing"