Amiga Graphics Archive

(amiga.lychesis.net)

45 points | by Bluestein 2 hours ago

4 comments

  • rob74 1 hour ago
    I have especially fond memories associated with this logo (which is a work of art all of its own IMHO): https://amiga.lychesis.net/assets/Logos/Psygnosis_1990_b.png

    And this one https://amiga.lychesis.net/assets/Logos/SiliconSynapse.png, besides being a very cool name, will forever be associated in my mind with The Lost Vikings (although I played that one on a PC, not the Amiga).

    • irchans 50 minutes ago
      I remember seeing the Amiga bouncing ball demo and being amazed.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ga41edXw3A

      The Amiga was the second computer that I ever owned. The first was a C64 that I bought freshman year. (My father bought a TRS-80 before that.)

    • bzzzt 1 hour ago
      Agree about the Silicon and Synapse name, they never should have changed it into Blizzard ;)
  • inigyou 44 minutes ago
    Calling it AGA gave a snicker to many people I'm sure
    • OCTAGRAM 10 minutes ago
      That's something many did not have. 85% sales were Amiga 500 and not upgradeable. IIUC possible to put Motorola 68060, but AGA required full replacement. And it remained something unseen. Something too late to crave for after bankrupcy. Something like unicorn. Like Roland for DOS gamers. We had SB clones on ESS chips, and they only had AdLib music. We were entering game configuration tools, and there was a choice of Roland. Supaplex had especially visible Roland choice. But nobody knew what is that Roland.

      As far as I can tell, non-AGA graphics is also charming enough. For many years I only had EGA and many games were not runnable, they demanded VGA. AGA does not feel like much anticipated upgrade like VGA was. There are hardware clones like MiniMig that lack AGA support and it is passable. IIUC MiSTer FPGA has MiniMig core with same lack of AGA.

      • Bluestein 5 minutes ago
        > We were entering game configuration tools, and there was a choice of Roland. Supaplex had especially visible Roland choice. But nobody knew what is that Roland.

        I distinctly remember this.-

        PS. In retrospect I wonder how it came to be that devs actually put in the effort/resources to code for such not-so-widely adopted hardware.-

  • inkkin 20 minutes ago
    Things were much better back then ;]
    • Bluestein 17 minutes ago
      I do not think the feeling one got when looking at Amiga visuals, in comparison to the state of the art then, in terms of wonder, can be described.-

      Perhaps one's first contact with a GPT3-class model's chat, might be comparable.-

  • dude250711 46 minutes ago