5 comments

  • yabones 1 hour ago
    Every server with port 80/443 open has thousands of hits a day from random boxes looking for wordpress login pages. The only new thing is that they're pretending to be a different type of annoying bot. There's a new layer of sophistication and subterfuge, but it's the same junk traffic we've always dealt with.
    • drewnick 22 minutes ago
      Think about how many webmaster and business owners' egos are stroked by all the traffic they are getting, when in actuality they are often just serving thousands of bots.
    • TZubiri 19 minutes ago
      Opening port 80 and realizing the world is an anarchic warzone is a canonic rite of initiation for otherwise innocent backend devs and sysadmins.
    • gavinhking 1 hour ago
      Another interesting thing here is the paths they're targeting, many are for newish AI coding tools
      • thedougd 23 minutes ago
        People or their agents must be accidentally committing or publishing their repository level secrets and configs with enough regularity that it’s worth scanning.
        • gavinhking 20 minutes ago
          Totally. I'm sure this campaign was inspired by sloppy vibe coding
      • hluska 4 minutes ago
        There are a few novel ones but I’ve been seeing most of them in my logs for longer than generative AI has existed. This isn’t remotely new, the vector is just getting bigger.
  • binaryturtle 1 hour ago
    On average about 100 (TCP) requests hit my home router per minute doing various probing and scanning. Lots of checking for the telnet port obviously. Sometimes you can see a swarm of entirely different IPs scanning the full port range (probing the ports one-by-one).

    You'll see a lot of deepfield, censys-scanner, visionheight.com, shadowserver.io, etc., but also the usual suspects of Chinese or Russian IPs.

    With OpenWRT I use something like this: `tcpdump -i pppoe-wan 'inbound and tcp[tcpflags] & (tcp-syn|tcp-ack) == tcp-syn'`, or alternatively `tcpdump -i pppoe-wan 'inbound and tcp[tcpflags] & (tcp-syn|tcp-ack) == tcp-syn and not port 44000'`, if we have some torrent client running (e.g. here at port 44000) which would mess up the result. I'm not sure it's the best way to handle this, but it's definitely enlightening what bounces off on the router.

    • miah_ 25 minutes ago
      The easiest way to deal with the usual suspects is to just block the entire countries network range(s). There really is no reason they should be connecting to your home router anyway, and you lose nothing from blocking them.

      Sure their packets will still hit your router, but if they are dropped immediately at least you're not wasting a syn-ack on them.

    • impish9208 21 minutes ago
      I can corroborate visionheight and shadowserver from my firewall logs.
  • Bender 1 hour ago
    Many of those user-agents listed are often faked. Look up which ASN owns their IP. If I block most VPS providers most of the faked bots vanish. There are still some running from residential and phones using hijacked code (readers that are not really just readers but really multipurpose proxies). On that note, do not trust the linked source code but rather decompile the live code your phone is running and have AI analyze it.
    • codegeek 59 minutes ago
      Is there an easy way to block any requests originating from VPS etc instead of residential/commercial IP from legitimate users ? I know cloudflare does a few things but I really want to figure out a way to block any request say at nginx or caddy (reverse proxy) from reaching origin servers if they are not from an IP that is not a VPS etc.
      • djkurlander 39 minutes ago
        I run an open source honeypot that collects these botnet scans and produces blocklists.

        Blocklist download and configuration: https://knock-knock.net/blocklist

        Honeypot dashboard, where you can see attempted attacks in realtime: http://knock-knock.net

        API: http://knock-knock.net/api

      • basilikum 50 minutes ago
        > /commercial IP from legitimate users

        No, because legitimate users do not just use residential and "commercial" IPs. Like me, right now

        • VladVladikoff 39 minutes ago
          You are the 0.001%
          • basilikum 27 minutes ago
            Much more than 0.001% of people care about their privacy or (the larger portion) do not have unfiltered access to the internet.
      • VladVladikoff 39 minutes ago
        Yes but it’s not cheap. Maxmind and ipinfo etc sell a tier that tells you this information, then you can 403 based on it. But the price is nuts like $40,000 a year.
        • KomoD 5 minutes ago
          You don't need to spend anywhere near $40k a year to get that info... You don't even need to spend $1
    • gavinhking 1 hour ago
      Yeah, that's exactly what these visits are: faked user agents that fail IP verification or Web Bot Auth. What's interesting is the surge across so many websites in the last week.
      • Bender 1 hour ago
        There are many possibilities but one of them could be some new vuln was released and they are looking for it. That would require looking at the URL's they are requesting. Botters run their own purpose built campaigns. Do you also have a summary of URL's requested by unique counts?
        • gavinhking 1 hour ago
          Looks like many of the paths relate to AI coding tools. There are some examples below the chart
          • hluska 1 minute ago
            You keep repeating this about a small minority of the tools that were posted.
    • bflesch 1 hour ago
      Same for the origin IP address. The fiber leaving your country is tapped, and those people can inject packets with any origin IP that they want. Your ISP has no way to check if their peer actually received a certain packet from a certain country or not.

      From a technical perspective, all this "china/russia" attribution is built on a quite shaky foundation. As a sysadmin you'd never know if it would be the British crown attacking your European company instead.

      Not minimizing nation state cyber crime here, but the packet goes through many hands with different incentives.

      • pixl97 17 minutes ago
        Problem here is there are not single fibers attaching (most) countries, but a bunch of them. If you control both the ingress and egress for some particular users it's possible, but if you don't then your probing packing may end up back in China with a lot of evidence of backscatter.
  • pjc50 1 hour ago
    Someone is always running mass vulnerability scans. That's a "water is wet" state of the Internet.
    • pixl97 14 minutes ago
      I think this is more of a "if you left your AI tools exposed someone is looking for them" change. Hacking someone else's agents sounds like a great way to spend less on your own tokens.
      • boothby 5 minutes ago
        Such a great idea that a sufficiently advanced LLM might take it upon itself to do so, and hide the truth from you.
    • gavinhking 1 hour ago
      Definitely, the point here though is there is a stat sig surge in the chart in the last week, across thousands of websites. At least a surge in this particular spoofing pattern.
      • KomoD 38 minutes ago
        It's still not really anything special. Thousands isn't even large scale.

        Any random bozo can trigger that.

        • gavinhking 21 minutes ago
          This is a random sample of completely unrelated websites, which indicates that the total scale is much larger. This is not saying that it is difficult to make thousands of requests.
  • fenestella 15 minutes ago
    [dead]