Brazilian election filter in X For You timeline

(github.com)

24 points | by LorenDB 51 minutes ago

9 comments

  • nomilk 8 minutes ago
    Seems Brazil's court (the TSE) banned platforms from recommending (i.e. via 'feeds' and similar) ~700 accounts related to its election, to avoid 'amplification' (unless the user already follow the account, in which case it's permitted).

    I'm not sure if this is a good or bad idea. But if I were Brazillian, I'd be immediately following all ~700 accounts (and probably unfollowing all 700 after the election).

    Love or hate X, it deserves a massive hat tilt for its transparency here.

  • flipbrad 45 minutes ago
    • Cider9986 44 minutes ago
      https://nitter.net/XBR/status/2088341967864320507?s=20

      DeepL:

      >Starting August 16, Brazilian election law requires providers that use recommendation systems to exclude from their recommendations the official accounts of candidates registered with the Electoral Court and the posts from those accounts.

      >On X, these accounts and their posts will no longer be recommended in the “For You” tab during the election period unless the user explicitly follows the account. Official candidates are not suspended, and their content will remain available on their profiles. This measure is expected to affect the visibility and reach of these profiles and their content.

      >We are implementing this measure to strictly comply with TSE Resolution No. 23,610/2019. This is neither a penalty nor a change to X’s rules. We are committed to setting a new standard of transparency regarding our algorithms. Follow our work here: https://github.com/xai-org/x-algorithm

      • matheusmoreira 35 minutes ago
        > Official candidates are not suspended, and their content will remain available on their profiles.

        Sounds good to me. Filtering all recommendations is fair, and they are not censoring the profiles.

        • jfoster 31 minutes ago
          I don't know anything about this specific case, but in elections more generally, wouldn't filtering all candidates equally simply favor incumbents?
          • matheusmoreira 7 minutes ago
            Brazilian electoral law tries to ensure all candidates have equitable access to media air time prior to the election. This filtering apparently exists to prevent distortions like X itself pushing candidates.
          • gpm 28 minutes ago
            Eh, I think it'd favour whoever has the bigger media apparatus running other accounts supporting them... which also seems like a weird decision.
  • cantfixstupid 3 minutes ago
    Bluesky creators: How are you feeling right now
  • delduca 17 minutes ago
    Good.
  • diego_moita 14 minutes ago
    It is interesting that attitudes, laws and initiatives that would be called "censorship" against traditional media are more and more accepted against social media platforms, all over the world in very democratic countries.

    I am not against these attitudes. I just want to point to that.

    A possible reason is that these platforms are seen as either monopolies or American imperialism agents. In both cases these are very damming perceptions. Both Musk and Zuckerberg have been disastrous in branding their platforms.

    • matheusmoreira 2 minutes ago
      I think it's a fair limit. Preventing social media companies from invisibly favoring any candidate seems sensible to me.

      Censorship is deletion of the candidate's social media presence.

    • Xirdus 2 minutes ago
      There are various laws in many countries that ban traditional media from straight up recommending specific candidates.
    • pocksuppet 7 minutes ago
      It's still called censorship when it's against a social media company.

      What interests me more is that Elon has completely reversed his anti-censorship stance. He was always censoring while opining against censorship and getting sued for millions of dollars for ignoring a Brazilian censorship law. Now he's just quietly complying with Brazilian censorship law.

    • surgical_fire 7 minutes ago
      The posts are not being forbidden or excluded. Candidates are still free to post. It just can't be recommended in algorithmic feeds.

      And those platforms are absolutely agents of American imperialism. Latin American countries in particular should be very wary of these.

      • pocksuppet 6 minutes ago
        That's how Elon always does censorship. "Freedom of speech, not freedom of reach." Restricting reach is still censorship.
  • threetwigs 5 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • hnp9j9qtda 1 minute ago
    [dead]
  • hndqbrg2uk 24 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • yellowcakex 39 minutes ago
    [dead]