The car industry A/B tested selling a car with and without CarPlay

(a.wholelottanothing.org)

57 points | by gumby 1 hour ago

15 comments

  • tristanj 39 minutes ago
    This is an invalid comparison. There were enormous discounts on the Prologue, up to $20,000 off.

    https://electrek.co/2025/09/23/honda-offering-over-20000-off...

    • StilesCrisis 33 minutes ago
      This is what I came to the comments for. The post didn't mention price a single time. It's not that expensive to retrofit CarPlay into any vehicle, and a 166% delta is hard to explain away with a single feature that can be retrofitted later.
      • izacus 28 minutes ago
        79% of car buyers explicitly said they won't buy a car without carplay: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/22/apple-carplay-could-be-a-tro...

        So the numbers check out and there's no need for you to find the blame elsewhere.

        • judge2020 6 minutes ago
          Doesn't excuse the article from making such a comparison without mentioning price.

          Ask that 79% of car buyers if they would forego carplay for a $10-20k discount.

    • xattt 32 minutes ago
      Also, warranty and services differences.
  • hadlock 37 minutes ago
    The japanese branded car outselling the domestic branded version in 2025 shouldn't surprise any millennial. If you grew up in the 80s or 90s getting shuttled around in a GM you almost certainly remember a piece of the interior coming off in your hand, or if you're an elder millennial, writing your name with your fingernail on the UV damaged interior of a late 70s/early 80s GM car that's only 3-5 years old. It's hard to shake that kind of shoddy build quality even decades later.

    Meanwhile my friends kids are turning 16 and inheriting the honda accord with 250,000 miles I remember getting shuttled to and from soccer practice when I was 12 in the 90s

    • mrits 5 minutes ago
      I remember my Kia being a joke and held together by duct tape after 2 years while 25 years later one of the hottest brands.
    • pyreko 20 minutes ago
      Came here to say this - this is a pretty meh comparison to me, there's too many other factors that are entirely ignored. Price and/or brand alone could easily explain most of not the entire difference.

      I'm sure there is some impact to not including it, tbh, but as is this article is a giant nothing burger to me.

  • techgnosis 19 minutes ago
    Yeah this is no good. If one says Honda and one says Chevy, then it's not apples to apples. It doesn't matter if it's the same car, the vast majority of people don't know that. Comparing sales numbers is meaningless.
  • captainregex 23 minutes ago
    It’s a partial driver, perhaps even meaningful in some way, but this is hardly an A/B test. Suffice to say lack of CarPlay is costing them in some way but model refreshes, steep price discounts, and other economical considerations are going to win out. Sure, 79% of some sample of car buyers said they wouldn’t buy a car without carplay but putting carplay in an otherwise crappy car isn’t going to magically make people buy that instead. There’s a lot of reasons Chevy is struggling. Blowing their own foot off with this decision can’t have been good for business but it’s certainly been hilarious for the quotes their execs have had to say in public with straight faces so they don’t get whacked for not following the party line. At some point I’m sure there will be a reorg where the opposite will become true.
  • bombcar 42 minutes ago
    We need a control group where the only difference is the Honda badge.

    I know a number of people who’d buy a Honda without a second thought but wouldn’t be caught dead in a Chevy.

  • theginger 4 minutes ago
    There is very little rational about car buying or branding. In the eye of many consumers a car with 3 wheels and 1 with 4 from the same brand will have more in common than 2 identical cars with different badges.
  • bornfreddy 41 minutes ago
    Were the two cars priced the same? Is public image of both brands the same? I'm not sure this was a good A/B test.
  • bradfitz 26 minutes ago
    I heard that the reason the major car companies started to sour on CarPlay was because Apple started to get increasingly needy with their data collection requirements (as of CarPlay Ultra) and the car companies weren't comfortable (or legally able) to give Apple that much canbus/telemetry data. And I guess Apple was pushing CarPlay Ultra as the only option without classic less-data-snoopy CarPlay?
    • ChrisMarshallNY 7 minutes ago
      I find that hard to believe. My experience with Apple (as a developer), is that they are absolutely brutal about data collection, and being an Apple developer, means toeing a lot of lines, wrt privacy-related stuff.

      It seems that every time I submit an update or new app, it gets rejected, because Apple just tightened the bolts a bit further.

    • majormajor 20 minutes ago
      Heh, the version of this I heard from a Porsche tech was that the reason Porsche's supported Carplay (added in 2017 models) but NOT Android Auto for so long (added in 2022 models) was because Apple wasn't snoopy and Google was.
    • izacus 7 minutes ago
      That explanation doesn't pass a sniff test if you even try to Google anything about car manufacturer data collection practices.
  • tqi 23 minutes ago
    That's... not what an ab test is.
    • netsharc 9 minutes ago
      As far as I can tell it's not AI slop, but I wish this author had asked one LLM if his example is A/B testing, because the AI would've told him no, and we wouldn't have to have read this garbage.
  • paimapi 36 minutes ago
    I test drove a new Subaru Forester a little while ago. I currently drive the 2015 version where the most advanced feature is the visual crash prevention system that brakes for you and a bluetooth sync that barely works

    and yet I hated the new Subaru so much. I hated the fact that the entire console is now one giant touchscreen, requiring you to look away from the road in order to operate. I hated the huge bulky 'Starlink' hardware hidden in the roof. I hated the fact that the MPG was barely better even with ten years worth of supposed engineering advancement and the Forester was now wider and taller which sucks for being a city car

    the last 15 years of 'innovation' in cars was a total mistake. call me a luddite but I really don't want my car to be able to be tracked by any satellite at any time. so it's either used cars for me from now or something like the Slate truck with the barest dashboard config (or a kei truck once it's legal in my state)

    • tshaddox 25 minutes ago
      The Forester still has the awful infotainment system with the vertical screen, first introduced on the 2020 Outback. I actually like the vertical aspect ratio, and the screen is pretty bright and high resolution, but the underlying software is disastrous. It was slow and buggy and felt outdated when it was introduced 6 years ago!

      For what it’s worth, the new 2026 Outback has an excellent new infotainment system and tons of physical controls for car settings. But apparently everyone hates it for the external redesign (I think it looks fine). Hopefully that interior will roll out to the rest of the models too.

    • easydidit 13 minutes ago
      I agree!

      Still driving my Toyota Avensis 2014 and I hope he‘ll serve me well for the next 10 years.

      I like the bluetooth connection it has so I can listen to my podcasts from my iPhone while driving but from a security point of view, I think the touchscreens are horrible. See this link: https://etsc.eu/physical-buttons-outperform-touchscreens-in-...

    • kotaKat 16 minutes ago
      Also everyone started screaming when Tesla was starting to rumor to start using the cabin cameras to recognize people when Subaru has a totally creepy facial recognition system on their current vehicles to do seating presets and the like. It was bad enough they use the cameras to imply I'm distracted or sleepy while I'm driving and have the things throw twenty million chimes and warnings, but actual driver ID is just terrible.

      God I hate our Forrester.

      • nkrisc 8 minutes ago
        I have a 2019 Forester so I think I just missed that.

        There’s a panel where the preset buttons for seat position profiles would be if I had paid for that feature.

        Seat position profiles is a great feature, making it automatic is completely unnecessary.

  • ChoosesBarbecue 42 minutes ago
    It would be better if we could see the other variables explicitly listed i.e. are they the same price (or same price for a comparable spec), what do the reviews for both vehicles look like, etc.
    • eastbound 35 minutes ago
      And are the buyers told whether there is carplay. Because you generally assume a car can't not include it, until you step in and realize.
  • matsemann 15 minutes ago
    I hate most cars' infotainment.

    I still absolutely don't want CarPlay or Android Auto to become the default. Should they become the arbiters of what I can and cannot do in my car? Should I be beholden them for features, or which apps they allow in their walled garden?

    Today I can vote with my money, choosing a car that fits me. If they all become the same, it's a monopoly.

    • saagarjha 13 minutes ago
      Just don't use CarPlay then?
    • chews 5 minutes ago
      Both CarPlay and Android Auto are second screens to your phone... they're just "Airplay" streaming a simpler interface.
  • dismalaf 10 minutes ago
    Is it a real A/B test? Honda's reputation is much better than Chevy's overall, regardless of infotainment system.
  • killingtime74 46 minutes ago
    So like an option....
  • I_dream_of_Geni 15 minutes ago
    I hate to say this, but (for every person I've asked) this was a simple "no-brainer". There must have been internal 'political' reasons to avoid Apple. Maybe the managemant hated Tim Cook?? I dunno.