9 comments

  • Cider9986 40 minutes ago
    THere's also archive.today who does great user-directed archiving. We don't appreciate this infrastructure some random guy runs enough.

    It's annoying how often archive.org blocks sites but they both complement each other very well.

    https://liberapay.com/archiveis/donate

    https://coindrop.to/archive

    When finding archive.today's Monero donation address just now, I had to use archive.org because donatemonero.org [1] is down.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20260526080016/https://donatemon...

    • LeoPanthera 32 minutes ago
      Um. You mean the same site that uses its captcha page to DDOS sites the owner doesn't agree with, and was banned from use on Wikipedia because the owner was modifying the archived pages?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today#2026_attack_on_G...

      I don't think we should be supporting this random guy, no.

      • andai 27 minutes ago
        Well then another guy should provide a technically equivalent and morally superior service ;)
    • qingcharles 32 minutes ago
      Absolutely deserves a donation too. How it keeps running is beyond me, especially as he/she/they keep adding more paywall bypasses on the backend.
  • pm90 44 minutes ago
    It was super easy to donate; Im so glad they have a landing page that supports several payment methods and makes it easy to donate. I love the wayback machine, hope everyone pitches in : ).
  • arjie 33 minutes ago
    I do like the Internet Archive but I wish I could retrieve large segments from it myself. It has very aggressive 429s. It would be a nice higher donor tier feature. Maybe it’s not possible to do so and retain 501c3 status? Regardless I have had to start performing personal datahoarding. C’est la vie.
    • thechairman12 11 minutes ago
      They posted on X about supporting this when someone was spamming them with requests
    • eru 29 minutes ago
      I wonder if they could sell you access to a bittorrent tracker? Officially it would be independent of the donations, just an extra service they sell?
  • sonicrocketman 1 hour ago
    Just posting this so others can be reminded to donate the archive (no association by me, just a fan).
  • qingcharles 33 minutes ago
    Just donated. Appreciate the reminder.
  • totalconfusion 45 minutes ago
    Who's paying?
    • killingtime74 41 minutes ago
      I click through to a few links and cannot find who is doing the matching
    • colesantiago 41 minutes ago
      Let's be honest, almost nobody is donating a significant amount i.e. $100K+ to the Internet Archive that would actually keep them alive.

      Everyone wants to scrape and extract from them 100% for free.

  • akudha 26 minutes ago
    How do they handle AI slop? If they index AI generated articles, it is just not sustainable, right?
  • crewman9 31 minutes ago
    Yeah, _no_

    Shut ClimateGPT down, apologize and then we can talk about donation.

    • LastTrain 18 minutes ago
      That is Internet Archive Europe, which is independent from Internet Archive
    • eru 27 minutes ago
      Interesting. How is ClimateGPT linked to archive.org, and why do you object to it?
      • kalleboo 18 minutes ago
      • stonogo 18 minutes ago
        ClimateGPT is built by Erasmus.AI, which says "Built by Erasmus.AI on behalf of the ClimateGPT Foundation, and supported by the Internet Archive Europe,".

        Brewster Kahle, Internet Archive founder (and board chair), is on the board of Erasmus.AI.

        It does seem weird to rattle the donation box because hosting costs are going up while shooting money at the prime cause of hosting costs going up.

        • LastTrain 16 minutes ago
          They are independent organizations with separate funding.
    • RileyJames 26 minutes ago
      What should archive.org apologise for in this regard?