Where has Construction Automation been successful?

(construction-physics.com)

22 points | by ltononro 1 hour ago

5 comments

  • schnevets 40 minutes ago
    I remember reading this article about Swedish home manufacturing two years ago, and immediately thought of the Hudson Valley (where I lived at the time) https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/08/headway/how-an-american-d...

    The Hudson River used to be a main manufacturing artery of the United States but has since become a relic. I still believe that region upstream of NYC could address the housing crisis plaguing the northeast of the United States. Imagine barges of housing components drifting down-river to be assembled in any coastal metro on the Atlantic coastline.

  • xnx 25 minutes ago
    I wonder how much of home construction efficiency improvements are held back by taste for traditional appearance vs. other cost/performance characteristics.

    The difference in styles between residential and commercial construction is probably an example of this. Not many commercial buildings with tar paper shingled roofs.

    • lotsofpulp 21 minutes ago
      The only reason I can think of that houses don’t usually have metal roofs is because they cost at least double, if not triple. I have seen homeowners use metal roofs, but it’s one of the first cost reductions because a good shingle roof is already good for 30+ years.

      For a business, it can make more sense as it might be a more long term structure, plus it would contain more valuable items (or at least cause more loss if business is interrupted).

  • knollimar 25 minutes ago
    You still have to solve all the MEPs so where does that go in your process?
    • dgellow 7 minutes ago
      What does MEPs mean in that context?
  • DivingForGold 40 minutes ago
    3D printing of concrete homes ?
    • wongarsu 28 minutes ago
      I wouldn't put that in the "success" category just yet
    • xnx 28 minutes ago
      Interesting, but currently more of a novelty.
  • nsonha 36 minutes ago
    It's kinda ridiculous that we still build walls brick by brick, on site, instead of just building most of the house elsewhere and only assemble at the site.
    • IronyMan1 13 minutes ago
      I think the Problem is transportation of larger Units, different buildung Codes from region to region and induvidual requestt
    • tylergetsay 22 minutes ago
      Theres less efficiency here than would be thought. Building codes, technologies, materials, styles, needs etc vary a lot by location.
    • throwitaway222 22 minutes ago
      Manufactured homes are a thing. You can literally buy one for 100k-300k
    • xnx 27 minutes ago
      If you're interested in the topic, the author writes extensively on manufactured homes.
    • Marha01 13 minutes ago
      Eh? Such houses are now common, at least here in Europe. I live in one! Entire walls were manufactured in factory, then brought on site and assembled. But the house is not from bricks, the structural material is wood and oriented strand boards (OSB).
    • knollimar 26 minutes ago
      Ever try putting a brick wall on a truck?
      • wongarsu 15 minutes ago
        Difficult with brick walls, but easy with concrete walls. The Soviet Union famously did that a lot. For the brick aesthetic, just add a brick facade on top. Or insulation foam boards and plaster for a more boring but functional look
      • nsonha 13 minutes ago
        sounds like a problem engineering can't solve? Stop using bricks is an idea.
    • edgyquant 27 minutes ago
      Why is this ridiculous?
      • nsonha 14 minutes ago
        do you build a car from raw materials and casting every component in the same shop?