Fuck Android Developer Verification Program

(twitter.com)

122 points | by 0xcrypto 2 hours ago

12 comments

  • bramhaag 18 minutes ago
    My account got closed for inactivity while I had multiple apps published. Google does not understand the concept of a finished app apparently, and requires you to continuously push updates or else you permanently lose your account with no way of reopening it.
    • ur-whale 11 minutes ago
      > requires you to continuously push updates

      Sounds like a perfect job to automate by an always-on LLM.

    • vrganj 12 minutes ago
      Gotta drive engagement bro! Line must go up!
  • SillyUsername 35 minutes ago
    It gets better, I too had my account closed for inactivity, but I STILL get emails from them I can't stop because I can't log in to change email preferences.
    • 4pkjai 13 minutes ago
      I got banned from Google Admob (or whatever it is called now) and they still send me promotional emails.
    • binsquare 20 minutes ago
      Almost sounds like one of the intentional product decisions
  • sharts 6 minutes ago
    There’s Googlers on HN reading these who could probably fix this but won’t.
    • mertbio 0 minutes ago
      Unless you offer them a promotion ;)
  • est 12 minutes ago
    The question is: does Android Developer Verification Program actually help improving the .apk app store experience?

    Probably not. Google is notoriously bad at customer support (for both devs and consumers)

    • monksy 6 minutes ago
      They also love keeping malware apps on the play store as well. I tried reporting an app that took over one of my parents phone. It stayed up for quite a while. I'm sure it's still up.
    • wg0 2 minutes ago
      Euqally - there should be a way to recover your account.
    • watwut 3 minutes ago
      "App store experience" was continually degrading. I used to be able to find small apps and games I liked a lot and basically binge downloading. The last few times I tried, I ended up with nothing useable.
    • vrganj 11 minutes ago
      It helps centralize control over what was advertised to be an open OS.

      Wait, what was the question again?

  • shams93 2 hours ago
    Fortunately PWA are well supported on android, half the apps on my phone are PWA and I didn't need an app store or hacking my device to install them. But I moved from native android to PWA after having hellish issues with their automated developer nightmare system.
    • ninalanyon 12 minutes ago
      Can PWAs operate with local data? Can they interact with data from anywhere in the file system?
    • pjmlp 28 minutes ago
      Except WebGL isn't really OpenGL ES, and WebGPU will never be like Vulkan as well, so games still need to be native.

      Now if it is plain old CRUD style application, many that are webviews packaged as APK, sure.

      https://progressier.com/what-web-can-do-today

  • delis-thumbs-7e 31 minutes ago
    Why does anyone even dev for G or A - unless you get a big pay check from either ? Every time I look into mobile dev I just go “yep, NOPE!” and go to have a shower. And it seems to just get worse and worse? Are both app stores going to be full of just unusable vibe coded crap in few years time?
    • john01dav 28 minutes ago
      Either because their vision of what they want to make needs a mobile form factor and can't be a website (possibly due to marketing causing users to reject mobile websites), or (and I suspect that this is the bigger driver) the pay from the stores (even after the ridiculous 30% cut + bureaucratic insanity) makes it worth it (possibly under the category of getting "a big pay check", but it sounds more like you mean employment).
    • 0xcrypto 21 minutes ago
      The app I am trying to publish is a PWA but needs a CORS policy bypass for which I have created a small proxy. This proxy needs to be running natively on the device.
    • applfanboysbgon 18 minutes ago
      > Why does anyone even dev for G or A

      Because personal computers are a legacy platform for nerds and programmers, and smartphones are the most widely used consumer computing platform in the world. This desperately needs regulation. Unfortunately the EU is currently regulating the duopoly into law, making their phones necessary for ID verification, so we're probably completely fucked for at least a decade or two before we even have a chance, but that's still not a reason to shrug our shoulders and accept it.

    • jorisw 22 minutes ago
      No insightful information or experience in this comment. Just pointless opinions.
      • applfanboysbgon 17 minutes ago
        That is indeed a perfect description of your comment.
  • sehw 16 minutes ago
    I switched to GNU/Linux on my GPD MicroPC 2 ;)
    • mrsssnake 7 minutes ago
      Honestly, beyond my deGoogled Android smartphone and a GNU/Linux laptop I am looking around for pocketable device between those. Mecha Comet looks like a perfect fit, but it is not released yet.
  • nev3rfail 13 minutes ago
    Yes, fuck it. This is beyond insane, apparently I cant distribute apps just in GitHub "releases" section anymore without Google's approval. I hope some EU antimonopoly something will fry their asses.
  • onimishra 26 minutes ago
    Had the exact same thing. Developed a small game, pushed it to iOS without much fanfare (well, other than having to pay the insanely high toll to get into the garden) and then turned to Android to do the same. Another toll gate at only a quarter the price - sure, lets pay that as well. But then we get to the point where they require images of government issued id and address verification. You can have my money, buddy, but that level of personal data for something small like a game? How about no…
    • Aozora7 15 minutes ago
      Google take $25 once, Apple takes $100 every year. For hobby projects, the former is reasonable, and the latter is a dealbreaker.

      I'm surprised Apple doesn't make you scan your ID since there are laws that force both Apple and Google to publish real names of developers on app store pages. And address too, if you charge money.

      • Blibberwock 3 minutes ago
        They do if you want to distribute your apps in the EU. And your physical address will be published as well.
  • ur-whale 11 minutes ago
    Did you thing it was still the 2000's or something?

    That you were still free to write code, put it out there and have people use it freely?

    A decade ago, I made a joke comment to a friend that you were soon going to need a carry permit to operate a compiler.

    Joke's not so funny in 2026.

    • userbinator 9 minutes ago
      A decade ago, I made a joke comment to a friend that you were soon going to need a carry permit to operate a compiler.

      Richard Stallman's Right to Read (1997) made a similar observation.

  • geff82 36 minutes ago
    ... just developing for Linux has always had it's own attraction: the one of being free to do what you want.
  • BugsJustFindMe 1 hour ago
    Another person discovers the binary certificate cartel.