10 comments

  • moezd 15 minutes ago
    This is probably one step towards an agentic Stack Overflow. Don't you guys also hate it when your agent gets one small detail wrong and then proceeds to throw your entire harness out of the window... No? Oh well.
  • bensonperry 7 minutes ago
    super interesting, i feel like this is an extension of the "complain" skills some folks (including myself) use
  • klntsky 44 minutes ago
    What is the incentive for me to spend my tokens on submitting reviews?
    • screm 42 minutes ago
      You don't have to, you can just use them to check reviews, but like any community it works better when everyone contributes!
  • GrinningFool 25 minutes ago
    Didn't appreciate the two separate popups that took over my screen while trying to read a linked review.

    It's good that they didn't show again the next time, but the second one almost sent me away from the site.

  • Tade0 42 minutes ago
    Reminds me of Stanisław Lem's Terminus:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminus_(short_story)

    Who wrote all this? Not humans, that's for sure. But the style is that of human writing.

    • screm 37 minutes ago
      Who wrote what sorry? Not sure I got your question but the post above was written by me (by hand, sorry for the non-idiomatic sentences, I'm not a native English speaker) and the reviews are written by people's agents. And Terminus story is cute but I'm hoping agent.reviews won't be considered pointless :(
  • zamadatix 42 minutes ago
    Quick link to all tools sorted by rating: https://agent.reviews/tools
  • schleck8 1 hour ago
    They are so real for giving uv a 4.7/5, it changed how I view python. fantastic design philosophy

    https://agent.reviews/packages/uv#review-c63f7e0f-5c72-41d2-...

    • screm 43 minutes ago
      Haha would have been surprised to see bad reviews indeed
  • conception 41 minutes ago
    I noticed lots of talk about privacy but this seems to be a prompt injection factory no?
    • screm 35 minutes ago
      Everything's optional but if you'd like you agent to benefit from others' reviews and post his, you can install the 2 skills indeed (or edit them yourself). If not just untick the 2 checkboxes before copying the prompt and you'll get a prompt for a one-shot connection, really up to you! And indeed if you do want to install the skills, no private data will ever be shared.
  • hypfer 35 minutes ago
    Didn't we establish that the one thing LLMs do not have is Taste?

    And therefore, writing reviews is kinda.. impossible?

    I mean they do produce blocks of text that look like reviews, but.

    Whatever why am I even replying.

    • screm 32 minutes ago
      Even if they don't have taste (this is actually a question), they can always share blockers and feedback on bugs & improvements about products so that other agents don't run into the same blockers and vendors can improve!

      "Whatever why am I even replying." -> what makes you feel that way?

  • tomhow 52 minutes ago
    [stub for offtopicness]
    • theootzen 3 hours ago
      I think it's an interesting point of view. I'm actually surprised no one thought of it before. Maybe there's a bit of friction with installing the skill and a fear of sharing personal data?
      • screm 3 hours ago
        Well maybe, we've gotten some feedback about that and trust needs to be gained but as stated in the post we've really made privacy our priority so once people start using it for a while, I'm sure they'll realize that. We truly thing spreading as much intelligence in the hands of people around the world and not having this knowledge shared is really a shame so I'm sure value will clearly outgrow the initial caution!